Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
229-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

229-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028690 50.866518)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028662 50.866515,-1.028663 50.866521,-1.028667 50.866526,-1.028673 50.866530,-1.028690 50.866533,-1.028707 50.866530,-1.028713 50.866526,-1.028719 50.866516,-1.028717 50.866510,-1.028713 50.866505,-1.028699 50.866498,-1.028691 50.866497,-1.028682 50.866498,-1.028674 50.866501,-1.028663 50.866510,-1.028662 50.866515)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL